Re: Right of way access
- From: ®i©ardo <Here@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:46:57 GMT
Periander wrote:
®i©ardo <Here@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:Y7V5j.5373$kt3.2918
@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk:
Precisely my point, and particularly relevant in a legal context where there should be no ambiguity.
Then you should have made yourself more clear.
My apologies, you are probably correct, although I did attempt to qualify my comment at the time.
--
Moving things in still pictures!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Right of way access
- From: Periander
- Re: Right of way access
- References:
- Right of way access
- From: rjre
- Re: Right of way access
- From: Periander
- Re: Right of way access
- From: Periander
- Re: Right of way access
- From: ®i©ardo
- Re: Right of way access
- From: Periander
- Re: Right of way access
- From: Palindrome
- Re: Right of way access
- From: ®i©ardo
- Re: Right of way access
- From: Periander
- Right of way access
- Prev by Date: Gross profit
- Next by Date: Re: How are mentally disabled adults to obtain sexual satisfaction?
- Previous by thread: Re: Right of way access
- Next by thread: Re: Right of way access
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|