Re: ANPR guilty until proven innocent?

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:30:14 -0000, "Uno-Hoo!"
<Uno-Hoo@NOSPAMbigfootdotcom> wrote:

But as I pointed out to Alex - there are any number of activities that you
cannot undertake without actually being in possession of proof of
entitlement. Why do you believe that driving should be different?

Because that is the law. I cannot be convicted of an offence simply
for driving without having entitlement documents in my possession. The
police, however, delight in confiscating cars when the driver has done
nothing wrong whatsoever.

Mike.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: So if you go back far enough....
    ... possession of property then they hold a strong ... that my friend...IS 9/10ths of the LAW. ... Displacement has taken place in your neighborhood too. ... they will display a sense of entitlement. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: So if you go back far enough....
    ... I don't think the phrase would've come into ... will pragmatically hold entitlement. ... It's true if you ignore the law, ... possession of property then they hold a strong ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: So if you go back far enough....
    ... possession of property then they hold a strong ... that my friend...IS 9/10ths of the LAW. ... Displacement has taken place in your neighborhood too. ... they will display a sense of entitlement. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: ANPR guilty until proven innocent?
    ... for driving without having entitlement documents in my possession. ... No they do not *take delight* in doing any such thing. ... the database indicates that the vehicle is uninsured, and if the driver is ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: So if you go back far enough....
    ... I don't think the phrase would've come into ... will pragmatically hold entitlement. ... It's true if you ignore the law, ... possession of property then they hold a strong ...
    (misc.writing)