Re: Langham out already....
- From: "Dave Baker" <Dave@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:33:42 -0000
"Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5q0k1rFt4ohkU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dave Baker" <Dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fhf426$akq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Aidy" <aidy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DvWdnYCy5aFLkqbanZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/7093905.stm
Good. I don't believe that what you view in the privacy of your own home
is anyone else's business.
Even if the production of that material has had a harmful effect on those
involved?
Then those who produced it should be held accountable for the harm they did.
Do you think that everyone who viewed the collapse of the World Trade Towers
on television, or recorded it on their video, or downloaded clips of it on
the internet should be criminalised because of the harm that occured during
that collapse? What about people who viewed clips of the beheading of
Kenneth Bigley?
--
Dave Baker - Puma Race Engines
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Langham out already....
- From: Dr Zoidberg
- Re: Langham out already....
- References:
- Langham out already....
- From: Aidy
- Re: Langham out already....
- From: Dave Baker
- Re: Langham out already....
- From: Dr Zoidberg
- Langham out already....
- Prev by Date: Re: do not trust me. You have been warned!
- Next by Date: Re: do not trust me. You have been warned!
- Previous by thread: Re: Langham out already....
- Next by thread: Re: Langham out already....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|