Re: Was Theo_delight prosecueted recently?

On Oct 30, 8:23 pm, Palindrome <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony. wrote:
On Oct 30, 6:48 pm, Palindrome <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony. wrote:
On Oct 30, 5:31 pm, Robbie <ngrobbi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony. wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:24 pm, Robbie <ngrobbi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony. wrote:
On Oct 30, 9:33 am, "Janitor of Lunacy" <gh...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"bealoid" <sig...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns99D8E18DC176FYAsfKJXSTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Name sniped from quoted text.
"Tony." <v_gete...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1193616713.577229.218620
@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
[snip]
Sorry old sport it was {snip} (the name of the 9 year old boy)
who you got into trouble with apologies to David
Has 'Tony.' just broken any laws by publishing that name?
No, because, as usual with Holland, it's total fiction.
Doesn't prevent prevent it being a breach of TOS, though & has been
reported to ab...@xxxxxxxxxxx
Look dip stick, you re not a barrister, youre not lawyer, youre not a
solicitor, youre avery sick individual who according to you has to get
around in a wheelchair...hell if I believed a word of what you say, Id
have rocks in my head, youre not only a weirdo, you re a sickoe as
well
Tony - do you know 95% of people who post at uk.legal are just ordinary
people? I think you have it in your head that it's some sort of legal
posting forum - it's not.
I know its not Robbie, but so many of them pretend to be either a
lawyer or a solicitor, and use language like cite this or cite that,
its just so funny at times.
Why do you have to be rude to people all the time - and why does your
language get worse after 8am UK time?
Im not rude to you, and if you look back over your posts youre not
rude to me, you work it out from there (hint..maybe after 8am your
time, Im just about ready for bed and the weirdos, freaks, no hopers,
medicated men who cant work come on...these folk in general have a
grudge against the world and should have been put down rather then
annoy the rest of the world, I can sympathise with Adolph much better
now.)
I know you're not rude to me - I was just pointing out that your
rudeness to others increased after 8am UK time!
--
Robbie- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well you usually dont come on after that time and you dont try to bait
me, this is my way of getting rid of the pressure of the day, I
actually work you know (the market went down today and the PBL CGJ
split takes off next week, I could go thru with you the structure of
product by Id bore you)...but yes there are times Im full on and this
keeps my lid on, usually I dog tired at the end of the day and playing
with the guys goes to far especially when its clear they are thick.
I'm not sure which category you put me in, but I expect that you will
tell me.. Although I hope that it won't be in the "try to bait" one.
When I have tried to suggest that you reconsider posts it is, actually,
out of a genuine intent to help rather than bait.

I have no idea of your life history but it is rather difficult to accept
at face value the things that you say about events that I (and others)
can know nothing - when, at the same time you post a version of events
that have happened here and on uklm that I do know about (or can easily
discover for myself) which don't appear to be supported by evidence that
is, after all, immediately to hand.

I get the impression that you really care whether people actually
believe that you were unfairly treated by the legal system in the past.
There are many here that I am sure consider themselves unfairly treated
by the legal system also - so you should have a sympathetic audience.

So, are the prizes from the games that you like to play really worth the
winning, if it means losing all credibility for the issues that are
important to you?

Not that us thick blowsy beer drinking cider swilling depressed west
country welfare recipient virgins are much of a prize..

Hi Sue,

I can respond kindly to anyone, but I do struggle to write well
certainly as well as most on here can, my take on my situation is
this: for many yeras I was gung ho to find out exactly what happened
in the UK, it started cos I never believed the thief had stolen
anything and I paid for information from all sorts of dodgy folk,
often going down many wild goose chases and getting dudded in
spades...gradually I got what I wanted to know.

Along the way my credibility was shot to pieces....the level of
corruption however was un beliveable and if given to me I would be one
of the first to reject it, But that it exists and has happened to me
is clear cut.

I have not got the talent to bring it out and most folk run away when
I start now, so I dont expect much, but I wont be put in my place when
I tell my story, unlike others I can prove myself up to the hilt what
I say, trouble is no one will check it out cos of my history in
getting it, and that includes bringing up my attempts to get the story
if that makes sense, its only documents now that I rely on, not any
guess work.

As an after thought, can you do a web page, (this is a UK thing, not
an oz thing, folk dont know the UK system nor the UK names I am using
but well if you wnat to earn aquid..talk to me.

I would suggest that it isn't your struggles with expressing yourself
that damages your credibility - it is your tendency to declare nuclear
war every time you perceive that someone is crossing your borders in a
rowing boat.. Such a response may have appeared to have worked very well
for you in many of your endeavours - but I would suggest that what it
does do is scare off the reasonable people that don't take advantage of
others and leaves just the "dodgy folk" for you to deal with. You may be
very successful in dealing with them when you are on solid ground that
you understand completely - but are very vulnerable when you don't. But
you know all that.

People that are particularly good at what they do can pick and choose
who they work for. And someone who is likely to switch into Doomsday
mode as a first response isn't going to be high on the list of choices.
Quite frankly, the only ones that I can see wanting to work for you are
those "dodgy folk" that do intend to rip you off...

But thanks for the offer. Luckily, for both of us, I have plenty of work
- it's just luuuuuv that I'm short of..

--
Sue- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You say it very well and of course that about expresses it correctly
the best can chose: think of it like this, at Christmas, i shall be
staying in a 6 star hotel in Hong kong for 2 weeks then i move onto
Switzerland and a very comfortable time, Im thinking of visiting
paris, munich, London and I could be persuaded to meet up with a
talented person to blitz my stuff into shape.....think of fine wine,
fine accommodation, alimo to pick you up at the airports.....here is
my private number

jjaholland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Was Theo_delight prosecueted recently?
    ... who you got into trouble with apologies to David ... Look dip stick, you re not a barrister, youre not lawyer, youre not a ... Well you usually dont come on after that time and you dont try to bait ... others and leaves just the "dodgy folk" for you to deal with. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Was Theo_delight prosecueted recently?
    ... who you got into trouble with apologies to David ... Look dip stick, you re not a barrister, youre not lawyer, youre not a ... Well you usually dont come on after that time and you dont try to bait ... others and leaves just the "dodgy folk" for you to deal with. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Was Theo_delight prosecueted recently?
    ... who you got into trouble with apologies to David ... Look dip stick, you re not a barrister, youre not lawyer, youre not a ... Well you usually dont come on after that time and you dont try to bait ... Such a response may have appeared to have worked very well for you in many of your endeavours - but I would suggest that what it does do is scare off the reasonable people that don't take advantage of others and leaves just the "dodgy folk" for you to deal with. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: [GW] Rumored release dates
    ... sling insults. ... you throw a pathetic jackass a bone and you just revel in it dont ... talk shit we can talk shit. ... so common mr intellegent, tell me what youre ...
    (rec.games.miniatures.warhammer)
  • Re: OT - Obama vs. Bush: NO DIFFERENCE
    ... and put up exactly why youre phonier than an 8 dollar bill and you ... just fucking snipped that shit like nobody noticed... ... this is the whole fucking point knumbskull you dont... ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)