Re: Why should my taxes keep you?
- From: TimB <stokefolk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:28:32 -0700
On 23 Oct, 10:00, "Terence Allan" <legalconn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Tony." <v_gete...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193113274.089522.167320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lets face it a lot of folk now depend on welfare, why should my taxes
keep them in the style they want to have, either they work or they get
nowt, and if they die along the way, too bad, if they rob banks and
others why not build more jails to keep them in or send them to forced
labor camps and feed them potato soup.
In an ideal society everyone should contribute either by financial or token
means - social parasites should be forced to work on community schemes or
tagged and face curfew from 7am to 6.59am (a tatoo branded on the forehead
"social parasite - beware) could also be utilised.
As regards criminals, the current three strikes and youre out (or sent in as
the case is) should be amended to
1) First offence - community service and 12 month supervision order
2) Second offence - imprisonment for a set period depending upon the crime
(minimum 12 months - no early release).
3) Third offence - if the crimo hasnt learned his/her lesson from the above
then extermination will protect the public from any additional crimes being
commited ( a bullet is far less expensive than a long prison sentence)
Result - after only a couple of years there would be almost no crime in this
country! (because almost all the serial criminals/repeat offenders would be
dead). Lets face it no decent, honest law abiding citizen would miss those
pieces of scum.
Whilst were at it - VOTING - only those who work and pay higher tax actually
contribute to the fiscal income of this country. We should restrict voting
(locally/nationally) to only those who are higher rate tax payers. After
all, its their contributions which pay for the majority of this countries
poicies.
As for immigration - only accept genuine asylum seekers (that is only those
from a country which shares a border with UK - think of it like this, asylum
seelers are seeking a "lifeboat" to save them from danger, if you were
adrift on the open seas you would grab your opportunity to board the first
boat you came to wouldnt you, you wouldnt pass it by and swim to one over
the horizon just because it was painted a nicer colour. Why some asylum
seekers need to travel quarter of the way around the world to get to Britain
is obvoius and nothing to do with trying to protect themselves.
Its sad these days that anyone with opinions such as mine is thought as a
fascist and racist when all they try to do is go about their business in a
lawful and socially responsible way - of course there is another word for
us - MUG'S!
BTW. If I form a political party will any of those reading this reply vote
for me!
Not a bad approach, but not viable yet. First we need to address the
lawmakers to make sure that only criminal acts are defined as such,
and the police to ensure they actualy 'police' things.
Otherwise, you just end up with a load of dead motorists and TV
license evaders, which the real criminals continue to roam free.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why should my taxes keep you?
- From: Dead Paul
- Re: Why should my taxes keep you?
- References:
- Why should my taxes keep you?
- From: Tony.
- Re: Why should my taxes keep you?
- From: Terence Allan
- Why should my taxes keep you?
- Prev by Date: Re: Kate McCann considers child welfare career
- Next by Date: Re: Reason #1 not to despise the police
- Previous by thread: Re: Why should my taxes keep you?
- Next by thread: Re: Why should my taxes keep you?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
