Re: Charging extra for goods after delivery - legal Q
- From: Peter Parry <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:25:08 +0100
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:48:15 GMT, Dave <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
My thoughts are that once the order has been accepted and the contract
was formed, that's it and it is legally binding. It would seem
unreasonable that retailers can arbitrarily make changes post contract
and expect you to pay (I am certain that if I refuse to pay the so
called debt would be referred to debt collectors and all that means).
My choices appear to be either to pay up or to fight it.
If you had paid by cheque and the goods were dispatched upon receipt
of the cheque would you expect to be able to keep them if later on
the cheque bounced?
The contract was for supply of goods for a price. You got the goods
and paid that price using a mixture of money and vouchers. Subsequent
to despatch they found one voucher to be invalid and, as is stated in
their T&C's, declined to accept it as payment. The contract has not
been varied, all that has happened is that part of your payment has
found to be invalid.
If the voucher was one sent to you by the seller and you complied
with the conditions of the offer then you have a legitimate
complaint. If it wasn't or you didn't you don't.
--
Peter Parry.
http://www.wpp.ltd.uk/
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Visa Debit Payment
- Next by Date: Re: Visa Debit Payment
- Previous by thread: Re: Charging extra for goods after delivery - legal Q
- Next by thread: Re: Charging extra for goods after delivery - legal Q
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
