Re: school bully is a teacher.

On 24 Sep, 08:57, "Norman Wells" <nor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alex Heney" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13udf3tq6gd6jomgrl0rnl5gqctnhsrnc2@xxxxxxxxxx
If there is just a 1% chance, according to you, of it not being Theo, how is
that "most certainly .. not proof beyond reasonable doubt, or anywhere
remotely approaching it"?

Just how low would the percentage have to be, in your own mind?

Just how many time do you have to be told that the standard of BRD
does not work like that?

If it's not Theo, it must be someone else. However, it seems that you
cannot explain even to yourself how it could reasonably be anyone else.

It could equally be someone else who uses Demon - I know not who - and
who has, for whatever reason, decided to cause trouble for me. By
using the Demon web-cache (which is mainly meant to speed up web
access, by the way) they effectively concealed their own IP address
and led you to the false conclusions you have made.

As for their motive, I can only guess but I'd say a likely motive was
that of revenge. That's revenge against me, Norman, for having helped
to put a stop to the spate of forgeries - which used other people's
emall addresses - posted via aioe.org a month or two ago. It was
never established who that forger was; I had my suspicions and I may
have expressed some of them, but I do not recall having accused anyone
on such flimsy, circumstantial evidence.

There's only one name in the frame, Alex.

The operative word there is "frame". As in "frame up".

We've already established you know bugger all about the law, Norman.
Are you a plod, a former plod or just a wannabe?

All am saying is that use of one particular proxy/cache is not proof
beyond reasonable doubt.

It may not be absolute 100% certain proof, but it cannot be ignored either.
And it cannot be taken in isolation as if it's the only evidence. Theo was
there at the scene, he took exception to things I said about him, he had a
motive to get back at me, the fraudulent postings came from exactly the same
proxy/cache as he, and no-one else here, uses, and they abruptly stopped as
soon as I challenged him about them. Moreover, he's never actually denied
sending them.

At best, that is more than somewhat inaccurate.

On Saturday (http://tinyurl.com/25vfy8) the following was posted:

[quote]

On 22 Sep, 23:51, "Theo_Deli...@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<Theo_Deli...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22 Sep, 22:22, "Norman Wells" <nor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

< snip >

I also told you to deny it, if you could. You couldn't.

Once more, nutty Norman, you are wrong.

I neither confirmed nor denied your silly accusation; whether or not I
could, should or would have denied it at the time you posted that
preposterous challenge, had I noticed it, is quite anothet matter.

Imitation is such an imprecise art, isn't it, Theo?
As you've found, it's so easy to get it catastrophically wrong.

I know that you wish to appear quite extraordinarily stupid, but can
you really not get it into your thick head that I HAVE NOT IMITATED
YOU?

[unquote]

What I'm asking you is what alternative realistic scenarios exist in which
it is not Theo. If there aren't any, why do you not think it is not him?

The reason that it stopped as soon as you started to kick up such a
fuss should be obvious to anyone - the doppelganger had done what s/he
had intended.

And, by the way, just why are you kicking up such a fuss - especially
as the "other Norman Wells" seems to have stopped posting?

I also know that it is quite common in this group for people to make
posts that they intend to appear to come from others (usually badly
done, but not always).

It could well be Theo. But I wouldn't even go so far as to say it is
"very likely" it is him, never mind BRD.

So, what percentage chance (just approximately because I don't want to
overtax you) is 'could well be'? What percentage, roughly, would be needed
for 'very likely'?

Who else would
have the motive to do that, and the ability to do so from the same IP
address as Theo always uses?

Anybody else who uses Demon to access the internet has the ability to
do so from that IP address. It is a generic Demon webcache address,
not allocated to any individual.

Yes, they 'could', but my question was who 'would'?

Well, _you_ would, if only as a diversionary tactic from the fact that
many, most or all the other people posting in this threads has been
called a liar by you - or that you have written that they were telling
lies - and that you have not yet apologised for such comments or,
indeed, for any of your other bad manners.

That's an excellent motive and, so far, it would seem to have worked.






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: school bully is a teacher.
    ... those who post to usenet. ... the thread right at its end, with no reason whatsoever to fabricate messages ... There must be a percentage you have in your mind that would constitute 'proof beyond reasonable doubt', otherwise it is impossible for you to come to any conclusion on the matter. ... If it's not Theo, ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: school bully is a teacher.
    ... Which false conclusions exactly, Theo? ... "forgery" and which, in reality, is nothing of the sort. ... The reason I did not state that earlier is simple: ... suffer fools gladly, I will gladly let fools suffer and you, Norman, ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: school bully is a teacher.
    ... who has, for whatever reason, decided to cause trouble for me. ... Which false conclusions exactly, Theo? ... as the "other Norman Wells" seems to have stopped posting? ... > Anybody else who uses Demon to access the internet has the ability to ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: The real reason for the Benson trade
    ... >I have this wild theory that the reason the Mets traded Benson was to ... Boston is nothing without Manny. ... > Does Theo coming back to Boston have anything to do with this sudden ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-mets)
  • Re: [Run Nunn] Crazy little thing called Love
    ... Someone who, like you, is actually _attracted_ to the emotionally damaged and needy character, because they identify with it and want to give it the chance that no-one else will, and be given that chance by them. ... At least, I underestimated the level to which you would appear to 'regress' once you got that chance, and I admit I really never saw the teenage Ben Nunn coming. ... there was a reason for that. ... There really is no middle ground for you. ...
    (uk.sport.football)