Re: Kate did it.
- From: Mike <spamdump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:55:18 +0000
The Todal wrote:
"Mike_B" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TCDuJazb3k4GFwAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
22- Will you let the twins talk to a child psychiatrist to let himI find it difficult to believe we can have gone this long without the vast
know what they saw?
majority of these basic timeline and event questions being asked.
It sounds to me as if the best Portugese criminologist has racked his brains
to come up with a list of elementary questions in order to earn a fee from a
newspaper.
But the final question is preposterous.
Is it?
Why would a psychiatrist be able to
elicit the truth from a couple of very young children who were almost
certainly asleep at the time?
Who's suggesting s/he would? I don't know if a psychiatrist could do it
but, more importantly, neither do the McCanns. The question is "will
you let...?" Well, would they or would they (or one of them) refuse
because they have something to hide. The answer to the (hidden)
question could come from their reaction to it.
--
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: Aaron B
- Re: Kate did it.
- References:
- Kate did it.
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: judith
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: The Todal
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: Dave Baker
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: Cynic
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: Dave Baker
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: Jethro
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: Mike_B
- Re: Kate did it.
- From: The Todal
- Kate did it.
- Prev by Date: Re: Electrol register
- Next by Date: Re: TV Licensing again..
- Previous by thread: Re: Kate did it.
- Next by thread: Re: Kate did it.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading