Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Mike <spamdump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:24:23 +0000
Uno-Hoo! wrote:
"Mike" <spamdump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:46b9b725$0$640$5a6aecb4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxUno-Hoo! wrote:
They're certainly not "invariably acting selflessly" - there is bound to be some variance in the reasoning. They are sometimes negligent in their use of force. Were they "acting selflessly in an attempt to defend the public" when a police officer shot and killed John Shorthouse Jnr. - who was lying in his bed at the time? Who were they protecting when they shot and killed James Ashley? How about Christopher Alder - who died on the floor of a police custody suite whilst police officers stood around laughing and making monkey noises?No - police officers who kill are invariably acting selflessly in an attempt to defend the public who they are sworn to protect.Utter rubbish.
So what do you believe they are doing then? Just taking pot shots at innocent people for the hell of it? Tell me, please.
--
Mike
.
- References:
- Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Dave Baker
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Cynic
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Mike Ross
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Jethro
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Mike
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Mike
- Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- Prev by Date: Re: Reason 15
- Next by Date: Re: Theo Delight
- Previous by thread: Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- Next by thread: Re: Stockwell 2 IPCC report
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading