Re: Theo Delight
- From: Cynic <cynic_999@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:19:31 +0100
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:59:31 GMT, "Lord Turkey Cough"
<spamdump@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Pettty complainants cause more trouble then people who do break the law.
As has been witnessed.
One small petty minded mans intolerant behaviour has destroyed the right
of
thousands
What right do you claim has been destroyed?
The one you mentioned earlier do you want me to quote you?
Yes, as I have no idea what you are referring to.
Thats ashort memory you have got.
No, I simply did not know which of my statements you were referring
to.
"Or are you upset that access has been blocked from a server that does
not allow your identity to be traced easily?"
Who says that anyone has a right to abuse a publication medium,
especially untraceably? Plus the fact that it is *a* server that has
blocked access to *one* newsgroup. There are hundreds of other
servers you could choose, and thousands of other newsgroups. You may
have to pay for access, mind.
You'll find that you would probably not get your views on widescreen
TV or F&M disease published in the Times, either.
--
Cynic
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Theo Delight
- References:
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Cynic
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Cynic
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Cynic
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Cynic
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Cynic
- Re: Theo Delight
- From: Lord Turkey Cough
- Re: Theo Delight
- Prev by Date: Re: Legal requirement for PAT checks?
- Next by Date: Re: Reason 15
- Previous by thread: Re: Theo Delight
- Next by thread: Re: Theo Delight
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|