Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: MM <kylix_is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:28:53 +0100
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:26:03 +0100, "Uno-Hoo!"
<Uno-Hoo@NOSPAMbigfootdotcom> wrote:
"Cynic" <cynic_999@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ps42b3909e7pjg2s6q81sg8dakpt5hmtk2@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:10:12 +0100, "Uno-Hoo!"
<Uno-Hoo@NOSPAMbigfootdotcom> wrote:
I'm pretty certain that it would be possible to trace the individual
who uploaded the material in the majority of cases. Kids are not
renowned for being either net-savvy or particularly careful.
Having found the uploader, enquiries would probably locate whoever
actually carried out the assault, and with more effort still, that
person could probably be charged and convicted.
But that would require some serious detective work. Far easier to
blame You Tube.
Do you know that such detective work is *not* being carried out?
If it were, then why call on You Tube to censor such useful evidence?
If Google were acting responsibly, they would pass on such stuff to the
police but *not* allow it onto the site for public titillation.
Yeah, and please let us pay another 20p in the pound in tax to pay for
the hordes of extra coppers that will be needed to inspect 10,000
videos a month!
MM
.
- References:
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Cynic
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Cynic
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Prev by Date: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Next by Date: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Previous by thread: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Next by thread: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|