Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Mike_B <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:33:30 GMT
In message <cnu0b3t3b1d9lt2ar1l8ibrctm59pbq92r@xxxxxxx>, Cynic <cynic_999@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:35:43 +0100, "Uno-Hoo!"
<Uno-Hoo@NOSPAMbigfootdotcom> wrote:
Of course they can determine what they're delivering. Like customs, they
could open the packet.
But whereas it is simple for Google just to *look* at what is being
displayed on their web-sites, the only way that the post office could
determine if they were delivering child porn would be by opening every
package and jiffy bag that came through their system. Clearly totally
unfeasible.
You think it would be simply to view thousands of video clips a day
and figure out whether they depict an illegal act taking place?
I would imagine an enormous number of videos on Youtube depict an act that is illegal *somewhere*. So not only would they need to be experts in what is or isn't legal, they would have to know the same things for every country in which their videos are seen.
--
Mike_B
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- References:
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- From: Cynic
- Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Prev by Date: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Next by Date: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Previous by thread: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Next by thread: Re: More police sticking nose in...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|