Re: Glasgow airport attack


"Fat Sam" <samandjanetknox@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Hvyhi.18671$3j1.10707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I see an incident which on the face of it looks like a terrorist incident.

so why can you not accept that people can take things 'on the face of it'? It seems the safest course of action in the long term.

Then I see evidence that suggests it might not be.

what evidence is that then?

2 asians crash a jeep into Glasgow International Airport terminal building -
reports suggest there had been an attempt by them to apply accelerant to start or encourage further, a fire -
reports suggest the jeep was driven at high speeed -
reports suggest the 2 men had to forcebly restrained by police and passers by -

if it aint terrorism then its a mighty big grudge against somebody or something at the airport.

I would really like to hear your alternate explanation given the evidence and reports available at the moment. I dont believe you've given one yet, other than to deny the most (in your own words) 'on the face of it' explanation.

I look forward to the outcome and charges of all this.

g.

.

Quantcast