Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Turk182 <digitalradiouk@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:04:27 -0700
On 30 Jun, 20:10, "Fat Sam" <samandjanetk...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Damot wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:30:55 GMT, "Fat Sam"
<samandjanetk...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Essex Laptops - Andy Usher wrote:
"Maria" <theoldwomanwholivedinas...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vv3d83d74je7r5cevs6nl10ebim6f0bke3@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:53:44 -0700, Turk182
<digitalradi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30 Jun, 17:51, Maria <theoldwomanwholivedinas...@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:44:10 GMT, "Tom Bradbury"
<tom.bradb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At no time did I mention .terrorist' - perhaps that is your
conclusion, and I must say it sounds reasonable unless it was
just people who got hacked off queing at the Avis counter while
waiting to hire a Mercedes - however, now you mention it,
reports say one man was
on fire, two arrested, and one was not of a standard white
european appearance - now doubt a really nice guy with an
attitude problem.
Non European? Say what it is then and no beating around the
bush. They
were Asian, and therefore most likely to be one our Muslim
friends, and I
use the term 'friends' in the widest context of the word.
Are Iraqis Asian now?
It seems that he's happy to make the hat fit the subject of his
prejudice.
The whole thing has me rather saddened - this car could simply have
lost control and crashed into the building (Initial reports
suggested that two cars had crashed outside the building and one
was on fire). What is making people believe that it was rammed, or
is a terrorist attack? I really hope it's not because the drivers
are 'Asian looking'.
Some Accident, one has a bottle with a flame coming out of it and
the other made several attempt's to drive through the doors, and
the fact that witnesses hgave alleged 2 men pouring petrol over the
car earlier.
Pouring petrol over the car?
Am I the only one who thinks this all sounds like an incredibly
ineffeicient way to mount a terrorist attack?
I don't care what the media try to tell the brainwashed masses. This
incident is not all it appears to be.
So you're having trouble understanding why terrorists want to cause
chaos and panic then? t
I know exactly why terrorists want to cause chaos and panic.
The clue is in the name. TERRORist.
I grew up surrounded by it, so yes I do have an understanding of it.
That's why this does not look like a real terrorist attack to me.
I mean, in all honesty. Stop for a second, step back from the hysteria and
look at the situation for a second.
Does dousing a car in petrol sound like an efficient way to carry out a
terrorist attack?
Simple answer...No.
This looks more like someone who's trying to pull the public's fear strings
through staged events and mass hysterical media coverage.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
My dictionary says a terrorist employs terror as a use of coercion.
People experienced terror today at Glasgow airport but no attempt has
been made to coerce us into a a course of action, so I presume the
'attack' has been done as a punishment for our actions. That being
the case, according to my cheap dictionary, these men could not
technically be described as terrorists. The government terrorises us
with hidden speed cameras, does that make them terrorists. Was our
invasion of Iraq a terrorist act, even though certain internal
procedures (but not all), were observed?
Turk 182
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Derek Geldard
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- References:
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Damot
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Fat Sam
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Prev by Date: Re: Veils again
- Next by Date: Re: Mobile phone jammers
- Previous by thread: Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Next by thread: Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|