Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: "Fat Sam" <samandjanetknox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:30:04 GMT
Fat Freddy's Cat wrote:
"Fat Sam" <samandjanetknox@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kUxhi.2337$oa7.2164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Does dousing a car in petrol sound like an efficient way to carry
out a terrorist attack?
in the circumstances you state above, then generally no. However,
lets add the bit you missed -
"dousing a car in petrol, and crashing it at high speed into the
terminal of a major international airport"
Simple Answer...Yes.
Glasgow closed to all flights -
knock on to other flights -
Edinburgh closed to cars -
other airports tightening security -
Seems like a perfect way to cause some chaos to me.
Okay then. answer this.
Why douse the car in petrol? Would the effect not have been the same if the
car was undoused?
Why not use something big like a van or a minibus?
Why was there more than one person in the vehicle? Surely the effect would
have been exactly the same if there was just a driver.
No, I'm sorry. This one just doesn't add up.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: ian field
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Fat Freddy's Cat
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: me
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Essex Laptops - Andy Usher
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- References:
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Damot
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Fat Sam
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- From: Fat Freddy's Cat
- Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Prev by Date: Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Next by Date: Re: Let's invent a new law... in the courtroom!
- Previous by thread: Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Next by thread: Re: Glasgow airport attack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|