Re: Tv license question
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:53:45 +0100
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 10:01:56 +0100, johannes
<johs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paladin wrote:
?Q wrote:
If you have a tv but do not have any channels tuned in nor any receivingIf you have any equipment capable of recieving TV then you need a license.
equipment set up.
It is soley used for playing dvds and games consoles do you require a Tv
License?
This is the only TV in the household. No sky NTL etc subscription either.
"If you have any equipment..." is by far too meaningless. You can have a TV
that is not tuned and not connected to an antenna. Then it is not capable of
receiving TV.
But to be on the safe side, you have to make it plain it can't be used as a
TV receiver.
Only if you so wish.
They will NOT win in court unless they can prove that you were
actually watching/recording it.
In theory, they could win if they caught you in the act of installing
it, but then they would have to prove that you were installing it for
the purpose of receiving programmes. Which would be difficult.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
The meek shall inherit the earth, if that's OK with you
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tv license question
- From: Palindrome
- Re: Tv license question
- References:
- Tv license question
- From: ?Q
- Re: Tv license question
- From: Paladin
- Re: Tv license question
- From: johannes
- Tv license question
- Prev by Date: Re: Tv license question
- Next by Date: Re: Underage Girls
- Previous by thread: Re: Tv license question
- Next by thread: Re: Tv license question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
