Re: Vista
- From: Adrian <toomany2cvs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 19:56:25 GMT
tim..... (tims_new_home@xxxxxxxxxxx) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :
Actually, I'm now wondering whether the slow speed of the laptop
(which is fitted with something like 512mb of RAM)
*DING*
is due to the bloatware anti-virus packages that came preinstalled.
Entirely possible.
Unlike previous version of Windows, XP is not broken (in any
way that most will notice).
Not that badly, no, but...
There seems no point to replace it, if you don't need to.
.... so why do MS seem determined to do exactly that via Windows Update at
the moment?
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Challenging a newly written will
- Next by Date: Re: Can a UK Internet Service Provider turn off a company's Internet connection by mistake and not be liable.
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista
- Next by thread: Re: Vista
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|