Re: 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- From: "tiscali" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:43:01 +0100
It's a witch hunt. A friend was recently found guilty of downloading child
porn onto his business computers a six years ago even though he had proof
that on many of the occasions the police said he was at his pc downloading
porn he was either out of the country or on the other side of it. Other
employees had access to the pc's and his login and email account. The police
never traced the ex employees (they left years ago). The jury ignored the
evidence of the defence and found him guilty anyway. The images were buried
deep in the pc in hidden files that you just wouldn't look for if you were
innicent.
This guy didn't do it, pleaded not guilty, and will probably end up with a 2
year sentence. It's a damn witchhunt and jurors are easily convinced by the
prosecution, possibly due to the display of the horrendous images in the
court. Why do they have to show the actual images? Nobody disputed that they
existed or what category they were, and it just inflamed the senses of the
jury.
And how easy is it to inadvertantly download porn? After this case I checked
all the hidden folders on my pc and found images of extremely hard adult
porn that I had no idea were there - I never accessed those sites! Seems
evey pop-up you delete leaves the images in hidden files in your pc! It's
really scary.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- References:
- 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- From: nacional
- 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- Prev by Date: Re: Land Grab
- Next by Date: Re: Insurance question
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- Next by thread: Re: 'Child porn too easy to locate'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|