Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- From: "Alan Holmes" <alan_holmes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:43:35 GMT
<Alang> wrote in message news:q1k723lth0623vb8ctvsosdagl9hsgvqcf@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:25:46 +0100, Damot <spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:08:27 +0100, Alang <> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:30:09 +0100, Damot <spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:29:05 +0100, Alang <> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:56:36 +0100, Damot <spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:56:06 +0100, Alang <> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:32:51 +0100, Damot <spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would never employ anyone who smoked on the very simple principle
that they are either stupid or easily coerced by others.
Good job you weren't around when we hired Churchill as Prime Minister
then.
Come to think of it Harold Wilson was not reknowned for being stupid
or easily led either.
Yes, all very predicable responses. I was simply pointing out that as
an employer one of the things I look for is common sense. Given two
candidates I'd choose the non smoker over the idiot smoker.
You're obviously one of those people who believe everything the
government propaganda machine spits out.
Oh please. Any idiot realises inhaling smoke is not good for your
lungs.
Churchill was 90 years old and smoked.
Wilson was 79
So what? I've known smokers get to 80 as well.Doesn't make smoking any
less of a stupid thing to do.
What you mean is it 'might ' damage your lungs.
LOL, how ridiculous.. Guess that coughing and spluttering is just my
body telling me to inhale more eh?
You tell me. I don't smoke
So why are you responding in such a silly way?
.
- References:
- Draconian No-smoking policy
- From: Sandra Johnson
- Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- From: Damot
- Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- From: Damot
- Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- From: Damot
- Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- From: Damot
- Draconian No-smoking policy
- Prev by Date: Re: Businessman recovers £36.000 from NatWest
- Next by Date: Declaring mental problems.
- Previous by thread: Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- Next by thread: Re: Draconian No-smoking policy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
