Re: Major assault
- From: "C R Fishwick" <crfishwick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:31:43 +0100
"Alex Heney" <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eret13drtqu2qhg140q0gip2g9th4qpruc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:24:54 +0100, "C R Fishwick"
<crfishwick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alex Heney" <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vmat13lh8adh36ipfnuttv6233dclf3kdd@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:56:15 +0100, "C R Fishwick"
<crfishwick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Richard Miller" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message<snip>
news:tHVUxW6mqnHGFwv+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No. It is an absolutely correct application of the law. There is no
conceivable basis in law that the major could have been found not
guilty.
But I applaud the magistrates for giving him an absolute discharge. It
is
clearly a case that should not have been prosecuted in the first
place,
and the AD reflects that.
Your statements seem to contradict each other! First you state, it's
clearly
assault, then suggest the case should not have been brought! You can't
have
it both ways!
Of course you can have it both ways.
The vast majority of what are technically assaults should not be
prosecuted, because it is not in the public interest to do so.
Why not? Again. Public interest? That, opens quite a can of worms!
It has always been the case that prosecutions have only been brought
if the prosecuting authorities have deemed it to be in the public
interest.
You may dislike that, but you would certainly dislike the consequences
of prosecuting absolutely every discovered crime, no matter how
trivial even more.
I do dislike that scenario! And why not? Oh, I forgot in the UK there is a
difference between the has and have not's:-( That makes quite a difference
in law:-(
One law for them and one for me!!!!!!!!!
And prey what's the term in Public interest? Not my interest, I'll be
bound:-(
--
Craven and Pendle Birds:
Bird watching in and around Craven & Pendle.
North Yorkshire and East Lancashire.
http://craven-and-pendle-birding.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Major assault
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Major assault
- References:
- Major assault
- From: The Todal
- Re: Major assault
- From: Gaz
- Re: Major assault
- From: Richard Miller
- Re: Major assault
- From: C R Fishwick
- Re: Major assault
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Major assault
- From: C R Fishwick
- Re: Major assault
- From: Alex Heney
- Major assault
- Prev by Date: Re: Whose property?
- Next by Date: Re: Contents Insurance, sum of contents insured
- Previous by thread: Re: Major assault
- Next by thread: Re: Major assault
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|