Re: Child porn 'art' to be made illegal

On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:21:30 +0100, "Derek Hornby"
<derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Child porn 'art' to be made illegal
Philip Johnston Home Affairs Editor
Daily Telegraph 3 April 2007
<snip>

Ministers said ''genuine works of art'' were not the target for
the new law - though there will be concern that heavy-handed
policing could see galleries raided.


Even the broadsheets are often guilty (as in this case) of stupidly
over sensationalising their headlines.

how can they have the headline that "art" is to be made illegal, when
the second main paragraph states exactly the opposite;?





If an image is not based on a real event, why is this harmful?
And if it's not harmful then why the new regulations?


Because TPTB find it disgusting.


And what if say a 7 or 8 year old child was to get out his/her
crayons and or paints, and produce an image of his/her friend naked.
Do the police use common sense! Oh I mean social workers.


Not for several years now :-(
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Reformat Hard Drive! Are you SURE (Y/Y)?
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.

Loading