Re: Cheques and 6 months
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:38:05 +0100
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:30:20 +0100, "nightjar" <nightjar@<insert my
surname here>.uk.com> wrote:
"Gonz" <T o p @ S e c r e t . c o m> wrote in message
news:R48Ph.71914$eX2.58214@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's the rules on cheques, and the issuer being able to cancel the
cheque/s over the last 6 months?
I'm in dispute with someone who owes me money for work that I've done.
The cheque that I was given didn't clear, and from talkin to the bank,
they tell me it was cancelled by the issuer.
I'm now issuing him with notice of taking him to court via Money Claim
Online.
Anyone who cancels a cheque in the hope of not paying the recipient does not
understand the legal implications of issuing it in the first place. A cheque
is an irrefutable proof of debt
Absolute rubbish.
A cheque is not irrefutable proof of ANYTHING.
It isn't even significant evidence of debt.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
It's as easy as 3.14159265358979323846264338327950...
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cheques and 6 months
- From: nightjar
- Re: Cheques and 6 months
- From: Karl Foley
- Re: Cheques and 6 months
- References:
- Re: Cheques and 6 months
- From: nightjar
- Re: Cheques and 6 months
- Prev by Date: Re: Speeding :(
- Next by Date: Re: Why shouldn't a sex offender work on a school's website?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cheques and 6 months
- Next by thread: Re: Cheques and 6 months
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
