Re: BT & DD
- From: "Alex" <no.spam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Mar 2007 17:53:04 GMT
At 17:31:01 on 19/03/2007, Madden delighted uk.legal by announcing:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:58:07 +0000, Uno-Hoo! wrote:
"tim....." <tims_new_home@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagewrote: >>>> >
news:56782gF26n13hU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"johannes" <johs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45FE62B9.18511FD4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MM wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:33:59 +0000, Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 06:48:55 -0500, Madden <Madden@xxxxxxxxx>
it >>>> >>>>> >can be aOn Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:23:19 +0000, MM wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:33:22 GMT, johannes
<johs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Stuart B wrote:
[...]
Another problem with DD is if something goes wrong, then
any >>>> >>>>> >overdraftheadache to get it sorted out.
Even if you do get it sorted out, you wont get refunded
keeping >>>> >>>>> a checkpenalty charges if the bank didn't cause the problem.
The first "problem" can be sorted before it happens by
payment . >>>> >>>>>on your phone bill online and asking BT to reduce the
wrongly >>>> >>>>> tellThe second "problem" isn't a problem .If a DD is taken
the >>>> >>>>> originator.the bank and get it refunded and let the bank sort it with
your >>>> >>>>> bank account balance .
The last "problem" can be avoided by keeping a check on
least >>>> >>> DOUBLE
How? If the overdraft was caused by a company charging an
incorrect amount?
Indeed so. I just got an electricity bill with a reading at
the >>>> >>> mistakethe real reading. The woman when I rang couldn't explain how
in my >>>> >>> accounthad happened. Instead of around £70 that I would have had
for >>>> >>> £172had I had DD in force, Southern Electric would have stung me
a >>>> >>> nice letter from the bank, ka-ching. DD can "go hang" asand I'd have been overdrawn through no fault of my own, with
far as >>>> >>> I'm concerned.
bills >>>> >do so using a budget account - where they know exactlyIndeed!
All that shows is that he is not interested in using DD.
A VERY large majority of those using DD to pay their utility
how much >>>> >will be taken each month, and it is the same each
month. (with >>>> >periodic checks and adjustments if it is getting
out of line). >>>> >
to pay >>>> >each bill by a variable DD.Some (maybe even most) utilities don't even have the facility
and >>>> help themselves. I want to receive a bill, consider whether
It is not the convenience I am missing. I just hate the idea of
letting some organisation poke into my bank account every month
it's >>>> accurate, then pay it in the way I choose with legal
tender, i.e. >>>> money, i.e. pounds sterling. I do NOT expect to be
fined for using an >>>> "inappropriate" method.
bit >> high)
MM
Hear hear!
It's not a fine. It's a charge for the extra cost incurred by the
supplier in processing your payment.
The principle seems reasonable enough to me (even if the fee is a
I agree. If you buy a product from an internet based warehouse then
you will, more often than not, pay less for that product than if
you bought it on the High Street (where shop-staff wages and other
overheads add to the costs). Is the High Street shopper therefore
being 'fined' for buying in that way?
Not at all IMO. If you choose to conduct your business in such a way
that increases costs to the supplier then you must be prepared to
contribute to those extra costs.
But if the supplier cannot demonstrate that the cost are any greater
WRT Internet Bank Transfer and DD, but charge according to a business
preference then how do you feel about it?
I would feel I have the absolute right to purchase the service from
another provider.
.
- References:
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Mike
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: BT & DD
- From: johannes
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Stuart B
- Re: BT & DD
- From: johannes
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Stuart B
- Re: BT & DD
- From: johannes
- Re: BT & DD
- From: MM
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Madden
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: BT & DD
- From: tim.....
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Uno-Hoo!
- Re: BT & DD
- From: Madden
- Re: BT & DD
- Prev by Date: Re: Catching mobile users.....
- Next by Date: Re: Police above the law? 159mph policeman has conviction overturned...
- Previous by thread: Re: BT & DD
- Next by thread: Re: BT & DD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|