Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- From: "allan tracy" <thunderbird57303@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Sep 2006 09:28:09 -0700
I thought Townsend admitted this and was cautioned?
Pete Townsend accepted a caution though no pornography was ever found
by the police.
Why would someone do that? Surely he could not be found guilty of
anything if no pictures were found?
I think he addmitted being there to do research for a book.
I must admit I would have thought his highly expensive brief would have
advised him to say nought and deny everything seeing as how there was
no real evidence.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- From: Webmanager_CritEst
- Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- References:
- Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- From: Steve Walker
- Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- From: Damot
- Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- Prev by Date: Re: a question
- Next by Date: Re: How to deal with incompetent plumbers and payment
- Previous by thread: Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- Next by thread: Re: Accused in child porn inquiry to sue police - Ore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|