Re: Not "All part of the job".
- From: "Andrew McGee" <amhome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:29:29 +0100
"DB." <anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cTvOg.20796$wo3.6374@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From "The Telegraph":
<quote>
PC sacked for joining in with 'dogging' couple
A Police officer has been sacked following an allegation that he
joined in with a man and a woman who were having sex at a seafront car
park
while he was on duty.
</quote>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=WCYKNW3BVVBUFQFIQMGCFF4AVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2006/09/15/ndogg15.xml
or
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V462225CD
We're all familiar with dog-patrols, but it seems that dogging-patrols are
something different...
--
DB.
What a wonderful name for a police officer!
But what a load of nonsense on all sides.
I'd just leave all parties to get on with what they were doing and stop
wasting taxpayers' money on it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not "All part of the job".
- From: Rob
- Re: Not "All part of the job".
- References:
- Not "All part of the job".
- From: DB.
- Not "All part of the job".
- Prev by Date: Re: Signing plod's forms
- Next by Date: Re: Tidying up computer files
- Previous by thread: Not "All part of the job".
- Next by thread: Re: Not "All part of the job".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|