Re: violent porn
- From: PeteM <Otcbn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:06:16 +0100
The Todal <deadmailbox@xxxxxxxx> posted
It would cover:
(i) serious violence*
(ii) intercourse or oral sex with an animal
(iii) sexual interference with a human corpse
As in SOA 2003. What is it about this government and bestiality? Could
it be that Blair himself is plagued by fantasies of shagging pigs and
cadavers, so he naturally assumes we all feel the same desires and have
to be stopped by force from putting them into practice?
--
PeteM
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: violent porn
- From: MM
- Re: violent porn
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: violent porn
- Prev by Date: Re: violent porn
- Next by Date: Excessive parking in small street? Advice needed please
- Previous by thread: Re: violent porn
- Next by thread: Re: violent porn
- Index(es):