Re: "Who was at the wheel?" case to be heard.
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:17:29 +0100
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:45:32 +0100, "M.I.5?"
<no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Conor" <conor.turton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f5fcc12ede3851298d4f8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <12fajkg6cp65697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Palindr?me says...
I, also, have never paid a penny in speed tax. But the present systemSpeed limits have always been that. All that has changed is the
/is/ a farce. Speed limits, that bear no relationship to anything other
than a number plucked out of a hat, are just another example of trying
to treat a serious illness by giving the patient an aspirin..No wonder
so few people stick to them...
enforcement.
No they haven't. Prior to ~1997, speed limits were determined by a set of
rules. It is only since that time that speed limits are entirelty
arbitrary.
Do you have evidence for this assertion?
I always understood that speed limits were set at the discretion of
those respo0nsible for the roads. Obviously there must always have
been guidelines, but I have never heard of rigid rules before.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Prune: A plum that has seen better days.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- References:
- Re: "Who was at the wheel?" case to be heard.
- From: M.I.5?
- Re: "Who was at the wheel?" case to be heard.
- Prev by Date: Re: Victims are not getting justice, says law chief
- Next by Date: Re: How many penalty points before they summons you for speeding?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Who was at the wheel?" case to be heard.
- Next by thread: Public Liability Insurance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
