Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:39:58 +0100
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:22:49 +0100, "Mark Hewitt"
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"M.I.5¾" <no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44a2220d$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You clearly don't understand the nature of failure modes in electronic
equipment. An item can fail after 4 months even if the item is perfect
when new.
Then it's up to the retailer to prove the fault was not inherant?
Correct.
Which is not easy with most electronic components, without signs of
externally caused damage.
I don't understand why he is having so much difficulty in grasping
this simple fact.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
I'm not broke, I'm just badly bent.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- References:
- Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: paulfoel
- Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- From: Mark Hewitt
- Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- Prev by Date: Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- Next by Date: Re: Life for knife monster, 17
- Previous by thread: Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- Next by thread: Re: Sale of Goods act - Replace or repair
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
