Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: "Harry the Horse" <HarryAtTheStable@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:08:59 +0100
"Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4e5te8F1da14eU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Full Name wrote:The scenarios may be different, but what counts (or should count) is the
On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:58:28 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
<AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Had it been a parent of these kids having photos of them as a
baby/toddler kept in a family album then the situation would have
been very different
Really, how so?
Well they wouldn't have been found guilty for one thing.
Are you really claiming that you don't believe there is any difference
between the two scenarios?
nature of the images in question.
.
- References:
- Naked children indecent - official
- From: NewsHound
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: The Todal
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: Dr Zoidberg
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: Dr Zoidberg
- Naked children indecent - official
- Prev by Date: Re: revenge website
- Next by Date: Re: Noisy bird next door - parrot kind?
- Previous by thread: Re: Naked children indecent - official
- Next by thread: Re: Naked children indecent - official
- Index(es):