Re: Cohabitees Rights
- From: "The Todal" <deadmailbox@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:46:19 +0100
"Willy" <bbapwilson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149092394.594800.77680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Postman Pat wrote:
"Willy" <bbapwilson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there really any need for such a reform?
I don't think it is reform, more a codification of what is the current
law
Completely untrue, thankfully, but I give it to you that you are
repeating the standard pub lawyer information :)
Not at all, the current law on Cohabitees Rights in regard to
constructive and resulting trusts are a bit of a lottery. As is another
statutory Right contained in LRA 2002 Schedule 1-3 in regard to
"Overriding" & "Overreaching"
I think when the Law Commission is considering the rights of cohabiting
couples they probably mean a sexual relationship rather than two people who
happen to have bought a house together. Though maybe that needs to be
clarified.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cohabitees Rights
- From: Mike
- Re: Cohabitees Rights
- From: Willy
- Re: Cohabitees Rights
- References:
- Cohabitees Rights
- From: The Todal
- Re: Cohabitees Rights
- From: Willy
- Re: Cohabitees Rights
- From: Willy
- Cohabitees Rights
- Prev by Date: Re: Family names
- Next by Date: Re: Naked children indecent - official
- Previous by thread: Re: Cohabitees Rights
- Next by thread: Re: Cohabitees Rights
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|