Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: "Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOO!!!!!!!@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:58:28 +0100
The Todal wrote:
"NewsHound" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b3vq72p7ffkhiliq3cg8h5jdo2188r5i26@xxxxxxxxxx
PAEDOPHILE TOOK PICTURES OF NAKED CHILDREN
By Chris Hudson
Macclesfield Express, UK: 31 May 2006
http://www.macclesfield-express.co.uk/news/s/213/213610_paedophile_took_pictures_of_naked_children.html
[ http://tinyurl.com/qdtkm ]
What is interesting about this story? I think he was rather lucky to
get off so lightly. I don't know how one can be sure that he did not
attempt to pose the children for his photographs and presumably the
children were not required to give evidence.
And posed or not , there is something very wrong about an adult having a
hidden stash of pictures he has taken of naked children. His jsutification
for having them and denial of sexual interest is incredibly implausible.
Had it been a parent of these kids having photos of them as a baby/toddler
kept in a family album then the situation would have been very different
--
Alex
Piece by piece the penguins have taken my sanity
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: Paul Hyett
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: The Todal
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- References:
- Naked children indecent - official
- From: NewsHound
- Re: Naked children indecent - official
- From: The Todal
- Naked children indecent - official
- Prev by Date: Re: Naked children indecent - official
- Next by Date: Irresponsible sister squandering "inheritance"
- Previous by thread: Re: Naked children indecent - official
- Next by thread: Re: Naked children indecent - official
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|