Re: Another lying *** gets off scott free


"Richard" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148648797.136210.312770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cynic wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:33 +0100, Richard Miller
<richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes - and as said, unless one of the parties *wants* the law to become
involved, then it won't. I see nothing wrong with that situation in
principle.

That's not entirely true - what about Operation Spanner?

Yes, it is not *entirely* true - but the exceptions are rare.

How did the activity in the Spanner case come to the attention of the
police in the first place BTW? Just curious.



I don't know. I have often wondered that myself.

A website claims that the police had a "chance finding of a videotape of
activities".


.