Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:41:19 +0100
On 22 May 2006 15:15:41 +0200, Irma Troll <troll@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Lawrence wrote:
Other than that, TVs do NOT need a license at all. It's perfectly okay
to have an unlicensed telly on which you only watch DVDs, play games on,
whatever.
I think you'll find this is incorrect. Any equipment capable of
receiving a TV signal needs a licence.
And those of us with any knowledge *know* that you are simply wrong.
That is FACT, as has been discussed on here many times.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: Irma Troll
- Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- References:
- Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: T.J.
- Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: nemo2
- Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: Chris Lawrence
- Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- From: Irma Troll
- Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- Prev by Date: Re: Another lying *** gets off scott free
- Next by Date: Re: More guilty until proven innocent police state tactics
- Previous by thread: Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- Next by thread: Re: Mobile phones that receive TV broadcasts, license needed?
- Index(es):
Loading