Re: tenants notice after fixed term: 1 month OR as stated in original contract?
- From: "tim \(back at home\)" <tim_back_home2006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:40:06 +0100
"Zoe Brown" <zoenaomibrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:yfM4g.4950$mH3.1753@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Geoff B" <Geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:445338ef$0$2561$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This has been asked in the past but, as far as I could tell, without a
clear answer.
My fixed term tenancy is long over and the original contract stipulated 2
month notice for both parties.
Do the original notice terms carry over OR are they replaced by the
statutory notice terms???
Also does a tenants notice have to end at the end of a rent period just
like a landlords does? Or is an arbitrary date sufficient?
I *mostly* agree with tim. The tow months notice would not be enforceble
*unless* they had been drawn up in a secondary contract and some evidence
that you had agreed to them despite them reducing your statutory rights or
something to that effect.
Your notice does have to end at the end of a term.
What makes you think this.
This has been discussed on this group many times, and
no-one has ever come to that conclusion before.
tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Stopping "doorstep" cold calling
- Next by Date: Re: Stopping "doorstep" cold calling
- Previous by thread: Re: tenants notice after fixed term: 1 month OR as stated in original contract?
- Next by thread: Re: tenants notice after fixed term: 1 month OR as stated in original contract?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|