Re: Orphan Drug
- From: Ian Stirling <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Mar 2006 19:46:24 GMT
GB <NotSomeone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Derek Potter" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:emeg12p8n60q3v74qeertf0n5j10ciarip@xxxxxxxxxx
Only then would trials be done on healthy people, and then
under very close monitoring. The skimpy report you quoted makes it
sound like some mad scientist conned a thousand healthy volunteers
into drinking his untried evil potion and surprise, surprise, some of
them got ill.
The Times reported that there were 8 people in the trial altogether. 2 got a
placebo. The other 6 are all very seriously ill.
If anyone with a clue could comment.
It seems "obvious" to me that the first trial should happen with one
person, or at most two.
Is there a good reason to use 8?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Orphan Drug
- From: Adam
- Re: Orphan Drug
- From: Derek Potter
- Re: Orphan Drug
- References:
- Orphan Drug
- From: The Todal
- Re: Orphan Drug
- From: GB
- Re: Orphan Drug
- From: The Todal
- Re: Orphan Drug
- From: Derek Potter
- Re: Orphan Drug
- From: GB
- Orphan Drug
- Prev by Date: Re: British 'house arrest' for those not wanting ID card.
- Next by Date: Re: Remedies against ISPs
- Previous by thread: Re: Orphan Drug
- Next by thread: Re: Orphan Drug
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
