Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: Derek Potter <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:35:07 +0000
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:16:43 -0000, "John Smith" <munro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Derek Potter" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ej2d12pmgk2td3fbhqoqikean00gdd4v2c@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:05:24 -0000, "Helen" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote:
According to a report in another paper, a DNA sample was taken at the time
of the rape. The rape was reported at the time, the victim has now
apparently identified Mr de Menezes (months after his photo was all over
the
newspapers) as the potential rapist.
Since a DNA test can be done overnight, it would follow that the
police now know with absolute certainty whether the allegation is true
or false. And since they have not said it is false, we must assume -
because we have a police force with an unblemished record of openness,
frankness and honesty - that it is true.
No because legally they need permission to test his DNA ;-) Permission
doesn't seem to have been granted yet!
Damn, but you're right. Smart move.
Why don't the family give permission?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: Cynic
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: Harry the Horse
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: John Smith
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- References:
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: Helen
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: Derek Potter
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- From: John Smith
- Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- Prev by Date: Re: Vendor refuses to exchange shoddy goods
- Next by Date: Re: Remedies against ISPs
- Previous by thread: Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- Next by thread: Re: De Menezes family furious over Met 'sex smear' on son
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|