Re: Tesco abuse customer
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:15:58 +0000
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:58:00 -0000, "Harry The Horse"
<HarryAtTheStable@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alex Heney wrote:
You're relying on S24(4), which I do not think is applicable here. The
Yes it is.
If they have reasonable grounds to suspect the person is in the act of
committing an indictable offence, then they *can* arrest the person.
alarm going off is NOT reasonable grounds for suspecting that shoplifting is
in the act of being committed. False alarms are very common.
24(1)(b) actually (although it must be combined with 24(4)).
And I think the law would disagree with your assessment.
Certainly the legal advice the BBC obtained did.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tesco abuse customer
- From: Harry the Horse
- Re: Tesco abuse customer
- References:
- Tesco abuse customer
- From: digitalradiouk
- Re: Tesco abuse customer
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Tesco abuse customer
- From: Harry The Horse
- Tesco abuse customer
- Prev by Date: Re: Tesco abuse customer
- Next by Date: Re: Tesco abuse customer
- Previous by thread: Re: Tesco abuse customer
- Next by thread: Re: Tesco abuse customer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|