Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- From: bigjon <bigjon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:04:26 GMT
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:19:07 +0000, Paul Robson wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:48:51 +0000, turtill wrote:
On 5 Feb 2006 16:35:57 -0800, "Huff" <Huffmast3r@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:People talk about underage sex, and you could report her
'boyfriend' but it is likely that no-one will take any notice.
Whoaah - hold back a minute -
That's a _very_ dangerous strategy - "it is unlikey" should read "in all
probability".
The consequences of reporting him/her to the police or SS _will_ get you a
shedload of poopoo dumped on all concerned.
First off, both yoof and families will get interviewed, then the yoof will
be taken for interview by SS...
Then, depending upon what the yoof say, proceedings will be fast and fairly
brutal....
The latest paranoia created by SS failures of care (tabloid fed, I know)
has meant that the plod/SS tend to act FIRST on these issues. Trust me,
I've been there more than once, and the local family beat officers and
Social Workers round here tend to cuff and stuff before asking questions.
--
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- From: Andy Pandy
- Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- References:
- Step-Daughter from Hell
- From: Huff
- Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- From: Huff
- Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- From: Paul Robson
- Step-Daughter from Hell
- Prev by Date: Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- Next by Date: Re: Know your 'neighbours' (USA style)
- Previous by thread: Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- Next by thread: Re: Step-Daughter from Hell
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|