Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: "Harry the Horse" <HarryAtTheStable@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:40:27 -0000
"Alex Heney" <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v74vt1p6kasrghjlhiril5jg1sp26kr8m1@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Of course there is.
>
> But that still isn't a *need* for the public to have that information.
>
> As I said, there is a very strong *desire* that they should. And there
> is certainly a very strong argument that it is necessary if this is to
> remain a society most of us would want to live in.
>
> But that "if" means it isn't an absolute "need".
>
It is an absolute need if you want to avoid being shot.
>>> But at the current stage, putting out too much information could
>>> prejudice the result of any trials that may happen.
>>>
>>Agreed but we all know that no trial will result.
>>
>
> You may believe that.
>
> We most certainly do NOT know it.
>
We know it with a greater degree of assurance than Mr Blair knew there were
WMD in Iraq ;-)
.
- References:
- Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Dave Baker
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Steve
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Gaz
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Steve
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: PeteM
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Harry the Horse
- Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- From: Alex Heney
- Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- Prev by Date: Re: RoHS Statutory Instrument 2005 No. 2748
- Next by Date: Re: Purchase of Repossessed House
- Previous by thread: Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- Next by thread: Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|