Re: Speed camera question
- From: "Harry the Horse" <HarryAtTheStable@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:23 -0000
"Alex Heney" <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u42vt15qcqssjvujqm8r9to5f0283565i9@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Which means that if you were prosecuted due to the car being
> unroadworthy (and it wasn't due to something that had happened while
> you had the car), there would be a significant chance you could sue
> the hire company for at least the cost of any fines, and maybe some
> damages to compensate for the points on your license.
>
> But *you* would be the one with a conviction, and the points on your
> license.
>
One would hope that the CPS would rarely if ever prosecute in such
circumstances, especially if the unroadworthiness were of a form not readily
detectible by the customer. But that would require some discretion and
common sense from the state, which is not very common of late.
.
- References:
- Speed camera question
- From: Andy
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alec McKenzie
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Andy Pandy
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Mike Ross
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alex Heney
- Speed camera question
- Prev by Date: Re: descrimination in the UK when applying for jobs
- Next by Date: Re: RoHS Statutory Instrument 2005 No. 2748
- Previous by thread: Re: Speed camera question
- Next by thread: Re: Speed camera question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|