Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:57 +0000
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:18:29 -0000, "Andy Pandy"
<spam8times@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Alec McKenzie" <find@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:find-C28916.13402331012006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > No, I am not saying it is your legal responsibility to check.
>> >
>> > How would you know you weren't breaking the law if you didn't check these
>> > things?
>>
>> You wouldn't know, but it would be your use of an illegal car
>> that breaks the law, not your failure to check.
>
>So that's a bit like saying going through a red traffic light is against the law, not
>your failure to check the colour of the traffic lights.
Yep.
And that is absolutely correct.
there is no law requiring that you check the colour shown by a traffic
light.
But there is one saying you must not proceed when a red light is
showing.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Useless Invention: AC adapter for solar calculators.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- References:
- Speed camera question
- From: Andy
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alec McKenzie
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Andy Pandy
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alec McKenzie
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Andy Pandy
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Alec McKenzie
- Re: Speed camera question
- From: Andy Pandy
- Speed camera question
- Prev by Date: Re: Police chief admits Menezes mistakes
- Next by Date: Re: Speed camera question
- Previous by thread: Re: Speed camera question
- Next by thread: Re: Speed camera question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|