Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- From: "Steve Robinson" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:18:32 GMT
"John" <John@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:41n929F1foonsU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:i7qg83-ph2.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> John wrote:
>>
>>> The police already know. A man was arrested because a retailer did check
>>> the details. However the police say that the other offences need to be
>>> reported by the mobile phone companies as they are the victims not me.
>>
>> Rubbish. Anyone can report an offence.
>
> Yes, but what is the offence. None of the companies has volunteered
> information as to why they are sending me bills. Obviously given the
> arrest of a man impersonating me I assume it is fraud. But without the
> cooperation of the companies involved it is very difficult to say what has
> gone on.
>
> I am the victim of the companies who are sending me threats and bills but
> AIUI they have not commited a criminal offence.
>
> Personally I would like to see laws that stop companies behaving in this
> way against innocent parties such as myself. That is why I asked if there
> is any requirement for diligence in checking identity.
>
>
It is very difficult for business to pick up id theft that's why its so
common now
.
- References:
- Identity Theft - Credit
- From: John
- Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- From: Peter Crosland
- Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- From: John
- Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- From: Jonathan Bryce
- Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- From: John
- Identity Theft - Credit
- Prev by Date: Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- Next by Date: Re: *** spammers
- Previous by thread: Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- Next by thread: Re: Identity Theft - Credit
- Index(es):