Re: Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- From: marc12441@xxxxxxxxxxxx (marc_CH)
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:15:41 GMT
In article <v4a7r15mm2n5hf8qqn8kampc89ns3pt8vf@xxxxxxx> trailerdave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote...
> >> Do you think Glitter has basically bought his way out?
> >> Or, was it a case he was easy game to get money out of!
> >
> >The truth is almost certainly that Mr litter is a child rapist and that
> >he has offered cash to the family who are *dirt poor* and they have
> >predictably accepted it.
>
> I think you should take a little look at the laws over there.
> Different countries do have different laws, you know.
> It is common in some countries to pay recompense to victims of any
> type of crime before a court case. That (according to the TV, and
> Gadd's solicitor last night ) shows to the judge that the accused
> person has shown remorse.
>
> Whilst not supporting what Mr Gadd has done I think one should find
> out about laws before screaming and stamping ones feet.
I think you'll also find that what I posted is entirely consistent with
what you have said. I think one should read the article to which a reply
is being addressed before screaming and stamping one's feet.
marc
.
- References:
- Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- From: Derek Hornby
- Re: Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- From: marc_CH
- Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- Prev by Date: Re: Gatso Speed cameras avoiding the fine
- Next by Date: Re: Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- Previous by thread: Re: Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- Next by thread: Re: Glitter 'pays money to accusers'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
