Re: Suing Google

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mrs.Smicker-Abacha" <Mrs.Smicker-Abacha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: uk.legal
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: Suing Google


> In article <lf8bq1tie3julgtb7d1psed0diou5solcd@xxxxxxx>,
> turtill@xxxxxxxxxxx
> says...
>>
>>On 18 Dec 2005 11:48:03 GMT, Dave the exTrailer
>>&lt;trailerdave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:04:06 +0000, turtill@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I think it is a straight forward idea that might go a long way to
>>>>making usenet a more inviting place to many people who otherwise take
>>>>one look and run. I see many established posters to usenet who are
>>>>afraid of using their own name because usenet is such a lawless place
>>>>and it is begging to be controlled the way it is going now. Even
>>>>anonymous posters get to libel people on usenet and that is the wild
>>>>west of the computer age when google even archives stuff like that.
>>>>Maybe I have a mission in life after all. To clean up usenet or at
>>>>least googles part in it;-)
>>>
>>>Will you be 'cleaning' up those (alleged) Libels that you posted
>>>against many others?.
>>
>>I never have libeled anyone.
>>
>>>>I don't think so. Usenet is a secretive place for a very few people
>>>>and the vast majority of the population do not understand it at all.
>>>>However if it was described to a jury I do not think it would be long
>>>>before it was regulated somehow. How come you never argue that people
>>>>such as those who posted the libel against me are in danger of
>>>>destroying usenet Alex?
>>>>pete
>>>
>>>Please answer a question for me.
>>>Are you totally innocent of posting Libels against others?
>>
>>Entirely. Try finding one.
>>pete
>
> LOL. They are coming thick and fast.LOL. The troll will be out soon
> protecting
> his bitch again.
>
> ---------------
>
> Subject: Re: What is going on now?
> From: smicker <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: uk.people.disability
> Date: Sun, Nov 30, 2003 6:33 pm
> Message-ID: <2rdksvke77iv740qadb59hstqprggl4ep9@xxxxxxx>
>
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:24:45 +0000, Andrew Hodgson
> <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>smicker in <sf6ksvokck284ra3d6j8r37271397sgueh@xxxxxxx>:
>>
>>>On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:52:28 +0000, Andrew Hodgson
>>><news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>No you add it to the header. See my headers.
>>>
>>>Maybe you thought the "no archive" action would cover your tracks when
>>>you wanted to interfere with this group. You were wrong.
>>
>>Well it doesn't really cover you since when I post with that in my
>>header, and someone replies quoting what I wrote, with no X-No-Archive
>>header, this will get archived to Google.
>
> So why do it then unless like drek you want to argue the post being
> replied to is the work of a hacker or because you do not want the
> complete header available for the same reason.
> smicker
> ---------------
>
> Go on then, here's a few more where you and snake seem to have been
> drinking
> quite a bit. LOL
>
> ---------------
> Subject: Re: What is going on now?
> From: smicker <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: uk.people.disability
> Date: Sun, Nov 30, 2003 5:10 pm
> Message-ID: <qu8ksvcon1ao5rbof8i8isrja9u3ndf6sb@xxxxxxx>
>
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:01:43 GMT, "Martin McGowan"
> <m.mcgowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Tone" <tone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:ci36tv02ijf0hhengu11b9s8f9svfij264@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:28:40 GMT, listsandstuff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Derek does have greater difficulties, well in my eyes anyway, in doing
>>> >what many of us find much easier with two extra senses. Whether he
>>> >would actually call it a 'difficulty' (or not) is quite a different
>>> >argument.
>>>
>>> How do you know that? Have you or anyone else ever met him?.
>>> Is he disabled?, because from where Im sitting his constant attacks
>>> upon DP's unless he can fool The Times, the Police, The Record and BT,
>>> he
>>is deaf blind, big article in times, repeated in the record about his Sit
>>in
>>at the Bt offices. he was actually arrested for it. LOL not funny for him
>>at
>>the time. Martin
>
> I know folks who went to school with him in Birkenhead and apparently
> he has always been a PITA. That is why no one would marry him.
> smicker
>
> ---------------
> Subject: Re: What is going on now?
> From: smicker <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: uk.people.disability
> Date: Sun, Nov 30, 2003 8:15 pm
> Message-ID: <emjksvof3d56lsusgjepv523mo5hf3pc4e@xxxxxxx>
>
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:49:06 -0000, "Peter V Rawlings"
> <peter_v.rawlings@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Derek Hornby" <derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:bqdgld$q5j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> "smicker" <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>>>
>>> > I know folks who went to school with him in Birkenhead
>>>
>>> No you don't, as I never went to *any* school in Birkenhead.
>>>
>>> This is not the first time *you* made untrue comments about me,
>>> that you can't backup. You've even claimed I wasn't blind.
>>>
>>> > and apparently he has always been a PITA. That is why no one would
>>marry him.
>>>
>>> Really, do you havce same view about all those not married, now careful,
>>or
>>> you may annoy, upset, Tufty, or Roz, or Jim's son, and anyone not
>>> married.
>>> Derek
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I'm impressed with braile technology: To relay the abbreviation, "PITA"
>>and
>>for it to be recognisable is truly wonderful!
>>
>>Back to the subsidiary contention: I don't think the comment was a
>>statement
>>of the being a "PITA" is the <only> reason someone might not be married!
>>Maybe they just haven't found the right mate?
>>
>>Lovely of you to quote those who you identify as not being married.....
>><yet>!
>>
>>"Nothing, if not discreet!"
>>
>>Duh!
>
> He can't be kill filed Peter can he. It's sunday night and there's
> nothing remotely as funny on TV. He is actually an old Berkonion, no
> that's not a new word either. He is an old boy of Berkenhead school or
> college or what ever they call institutions for berks.
> smicker
>
> ---------------
> Subject: Re: What is going on now?
> From: smicker <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: uk.people.disability
> Date: Sun, Nov 30, 2003 8:38 pm
> Message-ID: <e3lksv0in06e5mf16kgr58jp0gpnedr40u@xxxxxxx>
>
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:32:43 -0000, "Yasmin Jackson"
> <yasmin.jackson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> He can't be kill filed Peter can he. It's sunday night and there's
>>> nothing remotely as funny on TV. He is actually an old Berkonion, no
>>> that's not a new word either. He is an old boy of Berkenhead school or
>>> college or what ever they call institutions for berks.
>>> smicker
>>>
>>>Shall i show that poster the post they sent me and is denying?.
>
> Oh yes of course Yas. Give us all a good laugh. Lets see some of these
> behind the scenes moves:-)
> smicker
>
> ---------------
> Subject: Re: What is going on now?
> From: smicker <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: uk.people.disability
> Date: Sun, Nov 30, 2003 9:28 pm
> Message-ID: <e4oksvk9dsrifs7n4c1qgjsjbie2vel5hq@xxxxxxx>
>
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:54:07 -0000, "Yasmin Jackson"
> <yasmin.jackson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"smicker" <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:e3lksv0in06e5mf16kgr58jp0gpnedr40u@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:32:43 -0000, "Yasmin Jackson"
>>> <yasmin.jackson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> He can't be kill filed Peter can he. It's sunday night and there's
>>> >> nothing remotely as funny on TV. He is actually an old Berkonion, no
>>> >> that's not a new word either. He is an old boy of Berkenhead school
>>> >> or
>>> >> college or what ever they call institutions for berks.
>>> >> smicker
>>> >>
>>> >>Shall i show that poster the post they sent me and is denying?.
>>>
>>> Oh yes of course Yas. Give us all a good laugh. Lets see some of these
>>> behind the scenes moves:-)
>>> smicker
>>>
>>>Sorry won't download from scanner.
>
> Mail it to me Yasmin then I can add a whole lot of other stuff to it
> (lies) and repost it here LOL.
> smicker
>
> ---------------
> Subject: Re: What is going on now?
> From: smicker <rossprat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: uk.people.disability
> Date: Sun, Nov 30, 2003 10:43 pm
> Message-ID: <lfsksvgnlgc3a1ks7f5qor41rbuvefvt3o@xxxxxxx>
>
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:32:49 -0000, "Yasmin Jackson"
> <yasmin.jackson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>> Mail it to me Yasmin then I can add a whole lot of other stuff to it
>>> (lies) and repost it here LOL.
>>> smicker
>>>
>>>Its sent,don't add any lies see what he says?.
>
> Wow what ever is he doing sending something like that to a lady !!!!!
>
> I can't post that Yas, I will lose my connection. Absolutely shocking.
> smicker
>
>
> --
> Mrs.Smicker-Abacha

Hey Mrs SA, a trace of your usual posting moniker reveals you
to be a prolific usenet afficianado, and on some issues that
others may find controversial, "pro choice" etc, well I agree
with your stance.
But on this subject it has to be said you really are a bit of a nitwit.
Yet again, to "back-up" your claims you rummage through the
archive and repost ancient threads of PT's, but they prove nothing?
They really are innocuous. And it has to be said there are similar
threads with PT from the archive that involve you too, also innocuous.
Now Mrs SA, please accept my apoligies for segmenting, but don't
you find it puzzling when the DVD tray opens and closes for no
apparent reason? And isn't it so annoying when the cursor freezes?
Lycra huh?

Regards
GCs7.




.

Relevant Pages