Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: "The Todal" <deadmailbox@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:00:38 -0000
"AlanG" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i5saq1110n4f32g3mag4n4b1am0n41e64l@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:23:53 -0000, "The Todal" <deadmailbox@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Leslie" <science.fiction@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:Mo-dnRr_u5ZZtjneRVnyhQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> No the judge has got it wrong
>>> Asbestosis and other dust aggravated lung conditions are not effected by
>>> smoking there are several good sites if you goggle for them which
>>> explain
>>> what these diseases are and what causes them.
>>
>>I am sure that if the claim had been for asbestosis, there would have been
>>no contributory negligence.
>>
>>>
>>> Ask any family members of coal miners they would explain the symptoms
>>> and
>>> what caused them and how the government still to this day are haggling
>>> over compensation claims.
>>
>>It has nothing to do with the government. It is insurance companies. And I
>>assure you that 99 cases out of 100 (perhaps more) are settled out of
>>court.
>>Ever heard of Master Whitaker? You probably haven't, unless you are in the
>>legal profession. He is a High Court Master (a sort of junior judge) and
>>his
>>policy is to give defendants about 2 weeks in which to show cause why
>>judgment should not be entered, and then enter judgment, and then set a
>>date
>>for assessment of damages within about 3 months after that. He is the best
>>friend an asbestos claimant could have, and the worst enemy of insurance
>>companies.
>>
>>>
>>> The government is trying to cut the compensation on asbestos claims i.e.
>>> the judges out burst above.
>>
>>I don't think the government is doing anything of the sort but more to the
>>point, it has no control over what the judges decided.
>>
>
> I've just this year had lung damage confirmed as being caused by
> asbestos. As far as I can make out the only way I can make a claim is
> if I can prove where I contacted the stuff. Since it can take decades
> to show itself anyone who like me, moved around, is on a hiding to
> nothing. I was originally told it was dust damage so assumed it was a
> coal dust problem from my time in the mining industry. Went through
> the compansation claim only to be told I was ineligible due to me
> being classed as a surface worker. That was government policy.
>
> Then got another checkup at the hospital a few months ago where a
> specialist told me it was definitely asbestos damage as it had a
> different appearance to coal dust damage. Either way I'm stuffed
> anyway. :(
Pleural plaques? Or pleural thickening?
I suggest you contact John Pickering, a firm who specialise in asbestos
compensation claims, even those which other firms turn down. The deal is,
you make a list of all possible sources of asbestos throughout your life and
if any of those was an organisation who still have money (or whose insurers
have money) you stand to get some money.
http://www.johnpickering.co.uk/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: AlanG
- Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- References:
- When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: Theo_Delight
- Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: Just Another Legal Fan
- Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: Leslie
- Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: The Todal
- Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- From: AlanG
- When he farts, does he summon bats?
- Prev by Date: Re: Blairstapo to attack innocent babies
- Next by Date: Re: Blairstapo to attack innocent babies
- Previous by thread: Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- Next by thread: Re: When he farts, does he summon bats?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
