Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- From: "Lee" <Lee@...nippu.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:32:22 GMT
"Chris Howells" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:do22vf$jm6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Peter Crosland wrote:
>
..
>
> I normally find your posts quite informative but you appear to be making
> ridiculous assumptions based on the bare minimum of facts. There are
> numerous reasons why the OP might have been forced to step out onto the
> road -- the immediate one that comes to mind is to avoid being hit by
> someone using a skateboard/bike etc on the pavement.
and so are you the immediate one that come to my mind is the op is a muppet
--
regards
.
- References:
- Road Traffic Act Offence
- From: Paulie
- Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- From: Peter Crosland
- Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- From: Rob
- Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- From: Peter Crosland
- Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- From: Chris Howells
- Road Traffic Act Offence
- Prev by Date: Re: Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- Next by Date: Re: Can company dismiss an employee though sickness
- Previous by thread: Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- Next by thread: Re: Road Traffic Act Offence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading