Re: Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- From: "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:37:13 -0000
"Chris Morrison" <chris-morrison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134728066_587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I wonder if someone can clarify a point with has been getting some rather
> heated discussion in the canteen at work of late.
>
>
>
> Yesterday, the Evening Standard published several pictures taken by a
member
> of the public, from a footbridge, of Northern Line train drivers in their
> cabs supposedly being distracted while driving a train at 35mph.
>
>
>
> I would like to emphasise at this point that I am not initiating a debate
on
> whether or not these drivers where in the wrong. If they have endangered
the
> lives of their passengers then they deserve all they get.
>
>
>
> The point I have been arguing is whether or not the law has been broken
and
> an offence committed by:
>
>
>
> - This individual by taking these pictures.
>
> - The individual by sending them to the Evening Standard.
>
> - The Evening Standard by publishing them.
>
>
>
> The pictures concerned where extremely clear, high-quality, and very close
> up shots of drivers in their driving cabs taken without their consent or
> knowledge in which they could be clearly identified. This person has
> obviously set up a camera on a tripod with a zoom-lens, photographing the
> drivers of oncoming trains.
>
>
>
> I know (correct me if I am wrong) that if I was to go out with a camera
and
> take close up pictures of people in the street without their consent, I
> would be braking the law.
>
>
>
> Surely the same thing applies here?
>
>
>
> Train drivers are not Hollywood celebrities; surely they would have a
> reasonable expectation of privacy while doing their jobs, and not to have
> their picture taken and slapped all over the newspapers without their
> permission.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
While at it , was there not some law about not taking
photographs in the neighbourhood of law courts, not
just inside of courts.
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
was on http://www.nutteing.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
Valid email nutteing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- From: Chris Morrison
- Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- Prev by Date: Re: Why should the British cop get a big pension
- Next by Date: Re: Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- Previous by thread: Re: Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- Next by thread: Re: Legality of photographing a train driver in their cab driving
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|