Re: Voice Expert needed:
- From: "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:58:28 -0000
"Andre" <borgsw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130705028.688269.303060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For a tape 24 years old this purports to be the voice of John Humble
>
> Some experts including Professor Stanley Ellis and Jack Windsor Lewis
> have both warned that the ripper tape was a hoax designed to fool
> police and sent to police by a lunatic.
>
> But the issues are:
>
> 1. Could the voiceprint on the tape be matched to Humble now or not?
> 2. How could a match be done, what is the best technique
> 3. How strong would the match be in terms of certainty?
>
Is there any recording of his voice recorded and
stored by a relative
or someone maybe from 20 - 25 years ago ?
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.oldbury.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
Valid email nutteing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Voice Expert needed:
- From: Andre
- Re: Voice Expert needed:
- References:
- Voice Expert needed:
- From: Andre
- Voice Expert needed:
- Prev by Date: Relevance
- Next by Date: Re: Smoking ban in pubs
- Previous by thread: Voice Expert needed:
- Next by thread: Re: Voice Expert needed:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|