On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:08:52 -0000, "Peter Crosland" <g6jns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>You have no claim against Microsoft.
I'm not so sure. It's easily arguable that Microsoft have been
negligent for many years in selling software that is so easily
compromised and that their negligence has caused many hundreds of
millions of pounds/dollars in damage to hundreds of thousands of
individuals and companies.
I'd love to see someone try to sue them. Deep pockets would be
needed, of course :-(
Mike.
--
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
.
Re: Microsoft Kill my Site ... It's easily arguable that Microsoft have been ... >> negligent for many years in selling software that is so easily ... No 'mom and pop' can ever sue Microsoft... > negligent in applying patches and/or other appropriate security measures? ... (uk.legal)
Re: Microsoft Kill my Site ... >>Whilst I am no apologist for Microsoft I think you are wrong. ...>>negligent in applying patches and/or other appropriate security measures? ... > If someone sells me crap, and demands that I hunt down the fixes, is it ... /unknowingly/ let these faulty cars be out 'in the wild'. ... (uk.legal)
Re: Why Only On One PC? ... As far a software is concerned, Microsoft is not selling software...."Alias" wrote in message ... > that when they thought that banana peels, when smoked, would get you ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
Re: Microsoft Kill my Site ...negligent for many years in selling software that is so easily compromised and that their negligence has caused many hundreds of millions of pounds/dollars in damage to hundreds of thousands of individuals and companies. ... If someone sells me crap, and demands that I hunt down the fixes, is it ... then my fault if a newly-discovered crapness exposes me to a successful ... (uk.legal)
