Re: Self defence
- From: Clough <inuit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:41:07 GMT
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:56:30 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>I was certainly advocating the use aggressive self defence as a
>>principle. I gave examples of what can be done if sufficiently
>>trained. This was sweepingly condemned with hardly a suggestion of
>>alternatives.
>The impression given by your post was that you were suggesting this as
>an actual tactic, rather than a s one example of a general case.
>And that is why you were challenged on it.
>If you had been more clear at the start that the general was the
>important thing, and you were just giving an example (or even better
>have not given the example at all), then none of this misunderstanding
>would have arisen.
Well you gained a wrong impression. I could also have described what
sound you could have got from a guitar with a given set of chords, it
doesn't mean anyone could have then picked up a guitar and done it.
>Again, you are asking for specifics.
>Even if I had the training, I would not be prepared to suggest
>anything specific, because there are just too many variables to know
>from a simple little description like that what the bets course of
>action is.
>I would do whatever, at the time, I thought was likely to result in
>the least injury to myself.
And the wider the repertoire of responses you have learned and
trained, the more chance you have.
Clough
.
- References:
- Re: Self defence
- From: Clough
- Re: Self defence
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Self defence
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Self defence
- From: Clough
- Re: Self defence
- From: Clough
- Re: Self defence
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Self defence
- From: Clough
- Re: Self defence
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Self defence
- Prev by Date: Re: BT broadband contract
- Next by Date: Re: Self defence
- Previous by thread: Re: Self defence
- Next by thread: Re: Self defence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|